Hey.
We play the game…
…with numbers.
Numbers are…
…our thing.
The thing with numbers is…
…that once we create a constant for ourselves…
…a pivot…
…something like a compass…
…AI doesn’t have access to it.
It’s our number.
It’s in our mind.
By the time AI gains direct access to our mind, we’ll be gone.
For example, we establish a low buying average, over many buys, in something we consider to hold value.
Each individual establishes their own, meaning…
…it’s each person’s own low buying average.
It decides the multiple.
It’s the centre-half. The libero. It creates the play. It’s unique to a person. No AI access. The whole game has been taken away from AI. It remains a human game. It’s not what the masses are doing. It’s contrarian. It’s going to make money.
Volatility is a constant.
Disruption is a constant.
Fear is a constant.
Greed is a constant.
Mass-behaviour is a constant.
Pigs getting slaughtered is a constant.
We play it by constants.
We’ve even started using unique mass-logic defying indicators, that only we have defined, that no one else knows about or can dream of, and we’re using them successfully, with no access to AI.
We’re functioning from within a matrix where we control the game, AI doesn’t.
Beauty is, outside of our protective matrix, we have access to all of AI’s capabilities, should we choose to use them.
Not yet though. Specifically after the 160+ girls murder rumoured to be caused by intel provided by AI, correct me if I’m wrong. AI as it currently is doesn’t seem ready for seamless implementation. All those foolishly believing so at this moment are the pigs referred to above. Pigs get what? Slaughtered. I didn’t say this first. It’s a common market saying. Markets are a – constant. We trust constants.
There will be many more blow-ups before seamlessness is achieved.
Think of banking systems causing and compounding massive errors because of blind reliability on AI.
This of AI suggested war strategy backfiring because of lack of understanding of human psyche.
Think of investment strategy imploding, left with eyes wide shut to AI, owing to lack of proper understating of human behaviour and its unpredictability. Anyways, on the plus side…
…think of any level of positive upheaval that AI will cause.
Think maximum.
Thought?
Since we play it by constants, we’ll continue to thrive, maximum disruption and beyond.
Such is the power of constants, that we successfully harness.
