Tag Archives: Algorithm

Soil-Conditions

Posted on by
Reply

Hey.

The king wears…

…no clothes, …

…and doesn’t have an idea…

…as to what the adversary is wearing.

The latter, however, is aware of the former’s wardrobe malfunction.

Maniac versus potential fanatics, which is capable of a rational reaction?

Neither?

Probably.

It might seem though, perhaps correctly, that the former is exhibiting fanaticism.

Everything is a lie.

Over-reaction : huge.

Underlying cause : none visible, yet. Actually, adversary will now scramble to create underlying cause, even if it didn’t exist. Its leader is eliminated. One can’t expect reasonable reactions from a nation now one in anger. Anger as in, how dare you? Our guy might have been a demon, but who the hell are you to eliminate him and incite us to take over our own land. We might or might not want that, but WHO THE HELL ARE YOU? WHO ASKED YOU?

Status : the hornet’s nest has been disturbed. Deed is done. This blunder might well undo the king, unless he has planned to print his way through, which then will accelerate undoing his economy, which in turn will also undo the king. All arrows are promoting towards king – exiting stage – soon.

In this turmoil, world pays tax. Oil shock is upon us.

If one was in the adversary’s boots, one would have also sealed off Hormuz. What’s the surprise? Meaning, if one is surprised, where were your think tanks? Are they low IQ? Stupid? Non-existent? Probably a mix of all three, if that is possible. I’ll tell you why there is surprise. One grossly underestimated the adversary, who was in a state of preparedness to be able to seal off Hormuz in less than ten hours. That’s why there is surprise. Wars are won and lost because of the element of surprise.

Meanwhile, oil shock means mostly all components of the stock markets go down. Fall gains momentum. As value buyers, we are on high alert.

One is not rejoicing about what’s happening. War is terrible. Brings destruction to all involved. Acknowledged.

What’s happening is a stone cold implementation of entry strategy.

Staggered.

With small quanta. [Each quantum a function of one’s networth at that moment. Algorithm of that function to be decided by oneself.]

Wherever and whenever value is seen.

For as long as it’s seen, …

…or till liquidity gets exhausted.

When one enters at deep value, one has already made money.

It’s just that the world will stamp its approval during times of euphoria, which is when the money will show, as in the sapling having grown into a plant, or a tree.

That’s fine with us.

We absolutely ok with just keeping on planting sapling after sapling in the right soil conditions.

A Little Bit of Manual is a Good Thing

Posted on by
Reply

Sure.

Auto is the motto.

Keep some pivotal stuff on manual, though.

It’ll give you something to do.

Because it’s pivotal stuff, it decides direction, or quantum, or what have you.

Position-sizing is ideally done on auto.

You can write an algorithm for it too.

Yeah.

You can take auto to the nth level and then some.

Keeping position-sizing on manual, though, for example, makes you remain in touch with portfolio expansion or contraction. Central.

In my opinion, setting risk:reward is a trade to trade thing, and depends upon the underlying chart. Hence, being manual here gives more dexterity.

Same goes for setting stop-losses.

Which auto strategy to look at, when, is by default a manual thing. It should be, anyways, in my opinion.

This adds spontaneity to life.

Spontaneity has a certain freshness to it which makes work fun.

Some strategies are better off when not looked at for days.

Manual helps here.

When an auto strategy stops working, one needs to manually fit it to work again.

If the strategy needs dumping, you’ll need to see to this yourself.

Creation of a new strategy – you got it – manual.

The manual stuff keeps you moving, and fit.

The auto stuff just goes on auto, and if that’s all there is for you, you’re going to start getting lazy.

Befriend manual, but don’t become a slave to manual.

A little bit of manual is a good thing.

How and Where to Look for Outperformance

Posted on by
Reply

Is it surprising, that the kind of outperformance we look for crops up in unexpected places?

Not really.

Yeah, it’s not surprising. 

I mean, if we found a certain brand of outperformance in an expected place, well, everyone would make a beeline for it, and soon, it would be over-valued. 

There’s only one way we want to be in something that’s over-valued – when we’ve bought it under-valued. We’ll then keep it for as long as the ride continues. 

Otherwise, we don’t want to touch anything that’s over-valued, even though it might appear to be outperformance. 

Getting into outperformance at an undervalued level gives us a huge margin of safety. That’s exactly what we want. That’s our bread and butter. 

So let’s start outlining areas to look in. 

Task gets difficult. 

I mean, how will you define areas literally?

Button-clicks. 

Algorithms. 

No, you don’t need to know how to programme, to put together an algorithm. 

Just do it online. 

Put in it what you’re looking for. 

Hit and try. 

Ultimately, you’ll hit the right combo, Stay with it, as long as it’s working. 

What do you put in your algorithm?

Value. 

Good ability to allocate capital. 

Efficiency.

Frugality.

Humility.

Etc. etc.

You ask how?

Well, this is not a spoon-feeding session. 

You’ll need to use your imaginations a bit. 

It’s all possible, let me assure you. 

Meaning, it’s possible to incorporate traits like humility into your mother-algorithm. 

Do the math. 

Ok, so you’ve translated what you’re looking for into computer language without knowing how to programme. 

You run it. 

Where?

All over the place, online. Any finance site. Yahoo Finance, for that matter. 

You get some results. 

In these you look to confirm. 

Is the outperformance you were seeking there or not?

No?

Look further. 

Yes?

Has this outperformance been discovered by the general market?

Yes?

Look further. 

No.

Bingo. 

Look for an entry strategy, provided your other parameters, if any, are being met.