Category Archives: Market Psychology

Anatomy of a Ponzi Scheme

Posted on by
Reply

Charles Ponzi came up with the brilliant idea of paying early investors dividends from the investment money put in by later investors.

It’s as simple as that, and it’s called a Ponzi scheme.

After the first few dividends, promoter disappears, having lured many investors into a fake scheme with no underlying business.

Latest famous example of a Ponzi schemer – Bernie Maddoff.

Or, if you’ve not seen Damages – Season III, that’s about a Ponzi scheme too.

So what lures the common investor into a Ponzi scheme?

Simple. It’s called greed.

What triggers the greed?

The Ponzi schemer concocts a scheme that promises a rather too lucrative return. This return does not look unrealistic, so the average investor’s alarm signals don’t go off. Nevertheless, it’s more than high enough to make the average investor’s mouth water.

And what’s normally promised is a quick return, mind you. The average investor buys smoothly into the idea of doubling his or her money fast.

Then there’s lots of advertisment. Billboards everywhere. The Ponzi schemer wants to hit the public with ads about the tremendous returns.

The sales-people who sell the scheme are glib-talkers. They are smart, wear expensive stuff, basically exuding sophistication. They want to rub it in that they’ve made it big in life.

A Ponzi scheme’s documentation generally cracks under close scrutiny. I mean, when something is being sold to you without any underlying business, all you have to do is your dose of due diligence. Just pick up the phone and start asking questions.

What works for the Ponzi schemer is human nature. The first investors (who get paid dividends from newbie investor money) start talking. Actually, they start bragging. The human being likes to show off. And, the human being hates missing the boat, even if the boatman is a disciple of Charles Ponzi.

The Dark Side of Private Equity

Posted on by
6

Greed is the investor’s nemesis.

I’ve been guilty of greed at times.

Luck has been on my side, and I’ve been saved from losing money. I’d like to tell you about it.

In my experiences with private equity over the last four years, the one thing that stood out was the pitch of each scheme proposed. The average pitch just sucked one in by describing a world that would appear utopic to somebody in a balanced frame of mind. When greed sets in, balance and common sense go out the window. One gets taken in by the pitch, and without doing any due diligence, one is willing to bet the farm.

The private equity teams of today have a tool up their sleeve that creates pressure on the investor, and leaves little time for due diligence. It’s called the time-window. Most schemes are proposed to the investor with a very short time-window. Either the investor is in within the window, or he or she can sit out. Lesson learnt: if one’s due diligence is taking longer than the time-window, then the scheme can go out the window rather than putting one’s hard-earned money on the line.

One of the worst starts a newbie investor can make is a good one. This happened to me as a newbie private equity investor. I got involved with the Milestone group in the middle of the financial crisis, and I invested in their REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts). These people were honest, and the investments have yielded steady quarterly dividends since, apart from the property appreciation. I started thinking private equity was the holy grail, and that all forthcoming institutions and schemes would be like Milestone.

Big mistake. When Edelweiss knocked on my door with an 8 year lock-in real-estate scheme, I was lapping it up. One thing kept going around in my mind – the 8 year cycle they were trying to make me believe in. Wasn’t convincing, but I wanted the profits they were promising. Before signing on, it occured to me to do at least some due diligence. I insisted on a conference call with the management. During the concall, I became aware of one wrongful disclosure. The pitch had spoken of a large sum of money from overseas, already invested in the scheme. In the concall, it became apparent that these funds were tentative and had not arrived yet.

A wrongful disclosure is a big alarm bell for me. I have programmed myself in such a way that when I come across wrongful disclosure during due diligence, I axe the investment. Luckily, the mind was not totally taken in, and I stuck to this rule.

Then came Unitech. Second generation real-estate magnate. Big money. Big leverage. In a joint venture with CIG, Unitech was redeveloping the slums of Mumbai, we were told in the pitch. Each slum-dweller would be relocated with ample compensation, we were told. The scheme had a multi-page disclaimer protecting the promoters against anything and everything. Alone that should have been an alarm bell. Of course I wasn’t thinking straight when I signed the documents.

In the next few months this scheme got a few investors interested, but its corpus wasn’t enough for the first leg of investments planned. Then, Adarsh exploded. I’m talking about the Adarsh real-estate scam. CIG / Unitech could not find a single new investor for their scheme. Everyone was scared of real-estate. Then there was another explosion: the 2G scam. Sanjay Chandra, CEO of Unitech, was one of the prime accused. What would happen to my money? Was it gone?

I got together with my bankers, and for more than a month, we steam-rolled the CIG / Unitech office in Delhi with emails and phone-calls, asking for the money to be returned with interest, since the scheme had not gotten off the ground. Luck was on our side, and after a thorough documentation process from their end, I received my entire amount with interest, one day before Sanjay Chandra was sent to jail.

Moral of the story: double your due diligence when you feel greed setting in. Don’t get taken in by fancy pitches. Don’t get pressurized into time-windows. Tackle the dark-side of private equity with a clear mind and full focus.

This one’s for You, Jesse!

Posted on by
Reply

Jesse Livermore – market legend.

Not with us anymore. Killed himself in a bout of depression.

Jesse’s life will be remembered. He was a pioneer, establishing the basic rules of trading for modern mankind. In the process he won many fortunes, and lost back a big part of what he won because of the hit and trial process he had to go through, to establish a basic trading map for mankind.

His was a colourful life. Pioneers, however, cannot be judged by the average person. An average human being doesn’t have the powers to comprehend the conditions under which a pioneer functions.

There were times when Jesse would swing a leveraged line worth several million dollars, and this is the first quarter of the 20th century we are talking about. He established the need and the rules for a stop-loss by losing money big time. He also won big, very big.

Jesse was the king of shorting. In the mega-crash of 1929, his unswerving short line won him a 100 million dollars. In 1907, JP Morgan (the man, not the investment firm) personally requested him to square off his shorts asap, or the US financial industry would go bankrupt. Jesse loved America, and the American way of life. He squared off his shorts.

Jesse had an eye for big market moves. He would watch a stock and get into its nervous system. Then, he would preempt its big move and would make a killing. He observed that stocks fulcrum around pivotal points, shooting up or down many notches from there within a short span of time. Making use of this insight was not enough for Jesse. He shared his knowledge with the world, so that others could benefit.

Then, another very lucrative trading insight – buying above highs – comes from Jesse. People are making serious money today in Gold and Silver for example, using this very knowledge. Others have used this strategy to their advantage by latching on to the runs of Cisco Systems, Walmart, Wipro etc. in the past. Above a high, there is no resistance, coz there is no presence of old buyers wanting to sell. Jesse was the first to recognize this.

In the early part of life, JL was impulsive. He would lose everything he made by not sticking to his own principle of stops, for example. Later, as he matured, he developed the principle of letting a winning trade run. His way of putting it was that the biggest money in the markets was made by sitting.

In his later years, Jesse started treating cash as king. When the opportunities would come, JL’s line with the bank was as deep as the pockets of Fort Knox.

I’ve shared four principles with you which Jesse Livermore actively used in his trading. These principles are priceless. I admire Jesse Livermore, and wish that he hadn’t fallen to the disease of depression.

Thanks so much, Jesse.

Is Silver in a Bubble?

Posted on by
Reply

When the chauffeur or even the doorman has an opinion, the underlying asset-class is in a bubble.

That’s my definition of a bubble.

And that’s not the case for Silver yet.

A bubble is something psychological. The mind gets twisted into believing that one’s found the holy grail. And then one can’t get enough of it.

Bill Bonner predicted in the year 2000, that Silver and Gold would be the trades of then commencing decade. What a prediction! He went on to say that in the last stages of its run, Gold would rise at the rate of 100$ an hour. You can proportionate that for Silver. That’s how a real bubble behaves. Just go back to first quarter of 2000 and observe the financial behaviour of dotcoms.

This is not a bubble yet. We are nowhere near bubble behaviour. The common households have not started selling off their household Silver. The man on the streets is not obsessed with Silver as of now. (I still look at common-man behaviour, even for Silver, because in a bubble, one forgets affordability. Apart from that, Silver can be bought by the gram).

So, where does one go from here?

Simple.

The trader keeps trading with the flow and an appropriate, risk-profile-tuned stop. For heavens sake, he or she needs to be long.

And the investor keeps buying small stakes on dips.

Nothing fancy or complicated. A simple, common-sense strategy is all that’s required.

Outperformers know how to Focus

Posted on by
Reply

Want to outperform the markets?

Then learn to focus.

Outstanding returns are the domain of focus investors.

If one is not a focus investor, then one is a diversified investor.

Diversification is not a negative trait.

It gives an average result. Over time, one’s performance matches the market average.

There’s nothing wrong in getting an average result.

It’s just that if you want something extra, here’s what you need to do.

You need to identify one or max two baskets.

And then you need to watch these baskets.

Just why is Embracing Risk so difficult?

Posted on by
1

Sir Issac Newton : mathematics and physics genius.

Let’s cast a glance at his market record.

Bought 20,000 Pounds worth of shares in the South Sea Co. around the year 1720, when the scrip was at its peak. Company went bust.

After having bought into this company at a ridiculous valuation, Sir Issac chose to sit on his investment rather than embrace a small loss in the first leg of the decline. The loss became bigger and bigger, till all was lost.

In our society today, parents push their kids to emulate Newton as far as brain-power goes. Newton has been a classic winner in the eyes of society. Kids are taught to win from the beginning. Losing is taboo.

When a straight A candidate enters the market, he or she gets a rude shock. Here is a world where losing is bread and butter. The straight A candidate is likely to get hammered.

A winner in the markets knows how to lose. He or she loses many times. But loses small. Then come the wins. They are not booked small. They are allowed to run.

This concept goes against our basic programming. When we show a small profit, we want to book it and run. It is an ingrained reflex.

When we are losing, we wait to catch up and start winning instead of embracing the small loss and moving on. Also a natural reflex.

Thus, embracing risk is a very difficult thing to learn.

If one can’t do it after many losses, one should leave the markets alone.

The Willingness to Embrace Risk

Posted on by
2

Any given market-play can only prove successful if one particular state of mind exists.

I’m talking about one’s willingness to embrace risk.

I mean, one can define risk all one wants, and one can understand it to the nth level.

But is one willing to embrace it?

The answer to this question is the singular deciding factor between a losing market player and a winning market player.

And what does embracing market risk mean?

Setting a stop is a physical act. One can do it mindlessly, without the actual willingness to accept a loss when it occurs.

Embracing risk means the attunement of every cell in the body towards accepting a loss when it occurs.

Accepting the loss and then moving on to the next market-play.
No psychological entanglements, no what-if scenarios, no why’s, no energy drainage due to mourning. Just sheer acceptance of loss. Period.

That’s the state of mind required.

Then, over time, as the sample-size grows, one starts winning.

That’s because one only plays the market with an edge.

The Meaning of Risk

Posted on by
2

Market play revolves around one central factor.

It’s called risk.

Whether we want to deal with risk or not is up to us.

If we do not want to deal with risk, we should not participate in any market. Period. Let inflation eat our money away in the bank.

Don’t like that option?

Then deal with risk.

In my opinion, there are two ways of understanding risk.

One way is practical, and simple to understand and implement. I like this particular way.

The other way is complicated and mathematical. This method utilizes software to perform mathematical operations using calculus, and expresses risk in terms of greek alphabets. The software spits out an abstract expression of risk, which is then implemented in the trading strategy. I don’t like this method. It’s just a personal choice.

So let me just talk about the practical method of understanding risk.

For me, risk is the money that one can potentially lose in a trade at any given point of time, expressed in percentage terms of one’s total portfolio value.  Period.

Once the underlying risk has been clearly defined and understood, the management of this risk is implemented through a stop-loss which is outlined after considering total portfolio-size and after eye-balling relevant chart-patterns at hand.

This strategy makes risk something tangible, something one can deal with, in Rupee or Dollar terms. It makes market-play a matter of addition and subtraction. It’s practical, simple to understand and easy to implement.

Then, this understanding of risk needs to be coupled with a market-edge to constitute a complete market strategy.

Same story. An edge can be simple. Or complicated. Choice is yours.

Waking Up

Posted on by
1

It’s a new morning.

What’s changed?

This: last night, we saw self-belief in action.

Even if it was to be seen in a game of cricket. It was still self-belief. A rare commodity.

MS Dhoni walked in to bat, promoting himself up the order. Very brave. If this would back-fire, he’d never hear the end of it.

The singular thing that shone out in his batting was self-belief. He’d been out of form. His style was unique at best. Nothing copy-book. Just raw belief that he could do it. That he could win it for his country.

He just had one thing in mind: to dominate the bowling and not get dominated by it. And he translated that belief into a match and tournament winning innings of a life-time.

What one takes away from this glimpse of brilliance is that one can win if the desire is strong enough.

One is compelled to carry forward such a feat and translate it into one’s own professional pursuits.

Dhoni won a mind-game yesterday.

Whatever one’s profession is, at first it’s a mind-game.

The battle is won in the mind first. Then it is translated into the physical deed.

On that note, congratulations to the nation, and WELL DONE team India!

Why Japan?

Posted on by
Reply

Exactly, why Japan?

Twice in 66 years. Holocaust, and now this.

Ok, there’s the seismic blubla. And the Nostradamus stuff. Don’t know what to believe.

And where does something like this leave one’s portfolio. (Sorry, have to ask this question, even at a time like this. It’s purely professional, and perhaps what I’m writing here will help someone.)

In the doldrums.

Unless one bought with a MARGIN OF SAFETY. That’s when one can sit pretty, even during a crisis.

Or, if u are a trader, and are long Japan before such a crisis, where does that leave u?

Broke.

Unless you trade with a STOP LOSS.

These 2 basic concepts are VERY IMPORTANT. And one only realizes this during a crisis.

I still don’t know why Japan, but am sharing with u what I have learnt.

It’s all a give and take. I have access to so much of free stuff on the web and otherwise in life. So it’s absolutely ok if u get this knowledge for free from me.

However, don’t forget to balance your own equation with nature. Set something solid in motion, for free, for others to benefit from. Balance your equation.

Otherwise, eventually, nature will balance it for you. In a way you might not necessarily like, but will be stuck with.

Don’t wait for that to happen. Balance your equation. Now. 🙂

Are u a Whiner?

Posted on by
1

2 quick questions:

Do u play the markets? And r u a whiner?

If your answer to both questions is yes, third question: Do u want to change this condition?

If your answer to this third question is yes, please read on.

Whiners whine. They complain when things don’t go as planned. Also they don’t have any backup strategies. Mostly, they don’t have any front-up strategies either.

So, before moving into any market, formulate your strategy thoroughly. Define acceptable levels of loss. Define a strategy to implement if these levels are hit.

Also define a profit-taking strategy.
Define the tenure of investment.

Basically, define yourself. Have a very clear idea about what your risk-profile looks like.

Play it small initially, till you gain confidence.

And stop whining. 🙂

Flying Asset Class

Posted on by
1

What’s an asset?

Ever thought about it?

If not, you need to, if you want to fly asset class.

An asset is something that generates income for you. Even while u r not looking. That’s my understanding.

So is your house an asset?

No! Unless it’s generating a rental. Otherwise it’s generating expenses, and is thus a liability.

Sound investing generates assets.

Over time, the accumulative income of all your assets allows you to fly asset class, i.e. gives you financial independence. Even while u r not looking.

That’s the whole idea.

A Strong Case for Equity (Part 2)

Posted on by
Reply

Scams bother us. We panic, and then start cashing out of our Equities.

Can we stop and reflect?

There was some Jeep scam in ’57. Then Bofors. Fodder. Harshad Mehta scam in the ’90s. Dot cum bust. This century has been chockerblock with scams.

Let’s see how some holdings have performed over all these years. Reliance, ABB, Infosys, Wipro…these companies were microcaps at some stage in their lives. The long-term holders of these shares have raked it in big-time. Wipro has been a 300,000+ bagger over the last 31 years. The other three companies have been 1000+baggers. That’s BIG.

Some of today’s microcaps will make it as big or bigger over the very long term. They will be tomorrow’s blue-chips.

All of us want to set something aside for our kids. It’s human nature. So why can’t we think of holding equity for the very long-term, especially for our children?

What makes equity so special? Behind every scrip is human capital, which, if not involved in Scamonomics, fights inflation through innovation. The power to fight inflation is not inherent in other asset classes.

So let’s think seriously about very long-term equity holding.

What remains is the criteria for stock selection. That’s a deep topic, and we’ll delve into it some other day…

Gravity

Posted on by
Reply

Markets correct.

That’s what markets do.

Why do we cry when something does what it’s supposed to do?

And, more importantly, why did we buy at an expensive valuation in the first place?

Are we traders?

If yes, fine, traders are meant to buy at expensive valuations, coz they like to sell at even more expensive valuations.

If we are not traders, then it is not fine.

If we are not traders, then most of us fall in the category “Investors”.

Investors are not meant to buy at expensive valuations.

So let’s not cry over the effect of something we were not meant to do in the first place.

Learning to Fly

Posted on by
Reply

Pilots train in simulators.

No point putting many lives at risk by flying a real aircraft without proper training.

A simulator is next to the real thing. Actually, one up, they make these things worse than the real thing.

No such luck in the markets.

However much one simulates the markets, the real lessons learnt come from actual monetary involvement in the markets.

Books, theories, paper-trading, degrees, etc. don’t have it in them. They prepare you for something else, but not for the markets.

The silver-lining here is, that if we don’t want to, there are no real lives at stake here. We can keep it small in the beginning years, you know what I mean?

Small but real losses, leading to big life-time lessons. This would be the ideal result of one’s first few years in the markets.

Yes, it’s actually harmful to deadly for a newbie trader to make hot-shot profits in the beginning without having learnt the proper lessons.

Let’s see you figure out the why for this. No spoon-feeding here, right?

What Money-on-the-Line does for You

Posted on by
Reply

Your system has a bio-chemistry.

This bio-chemistry is intricately coupled to the mind and the nervous system.

When your money is on the line, your mind and your nervous system start reacting.

Money-on-the-line means automatic emotional involvement. Period.

Many of those who talk about investing / trading do not have their own money on the line.

Thus, they are not qualified to talk about investing / trading. Do not listen to them.

Instead, listen to your own bio-chemistry. It will teach you.

That’s what money-on-the-line does for you.

A Level-Headed Approach to the Markets

Posted on by
Reply

There’s lots to choose from in the market-place.

Many seek a profession in the markets. If you belong to this category, first spend as much time as possible trying out as much as you can from the vast choice this multi-faceted international trading fraternity has to offer. Develop a feel for things. Your first goal is to identify a niche-segment for yourself. It will take as long as it takes. Have patience. Are you more comfortable with equity rather than commodities, which are even more volatile? Are you just happy doing arbitrage? Or, do you prefer options? It’s questions like these you are trying to answer at this stage.

Remember, the markets don’t require an MBA or any other recognized degree qualification for one to be successful. Honestly speaking, degrees are a hindrance, since the teaching is done by professors who are mostly theoretically active.  One out of a hundred market-teachers actually plays the market with his or her own money. Thus most or all one learns about the markets in college is not really relevant.

Wanna learn to be successful at the markets? Then play them. With your own money. Day in, day out. Feel the pain of loss. Feel the pleasure of profit. Make all the mistakes you can at this stage while things are still small. Let’s see you taking small losses and letting profits run, the easiest thing in the world to say but the hardest thing in the world to do. Let’s see you starting to get the basics right at least and then building up from there.

Thus, slowly but surely, identify your A-game, i.e. your niche-segment. This is the area you are most comfortable moving in. And that’s why, when developed properly, this area will give you a regular income very soon. Since you are comfortable in the area you move in now, that’s your next goal: A Regular Income.

More on that some other day…

System Addict & Mr. Cool

Posted on by
Reply

Mr. Cool starts his day.

He wants to know what other people are doing. To be more exact, what they are trading. He listens to tips. Actually, “listens” is an understatement. He’s hungry for tips. He shorts strong stocks, and goes long those that have corrected. He wants to be Mr. Johny-on-the spot where the action is.

Mr. Cool gets up late. Of course no preparation for the trading day is on the agenda. In fact, he has no agenda other than the format stated above. The day starts off with a call to the broker. What’s moving? What are the news projections? Any hot tips? What’s this analyst saying?

Mr. Cool doesn’t live long in the markets. His “strategy” of trading long into correcting stocks and shorting strong ones pays off 80% of the time, but when it goes wrong, it goes wrong big, in fact so big, that Mr. Cool doesn’t feel so cool anymore. He holds on to his losses. He’s scared of taking the hit. He hopes that prices will reverse to his entry price and then he wants to exit. This time around, it doesn’t happen, and his cheap options expire worthless, leaving him broke. By now the markets have scared him so much, that he nevers trades again.

Mr. System Addict is everything Mr. Cool is not. He has a system, and he sticks to it. No tips, no news, no rumours, no non-sense. If the system indicates a buy, he goes long. If it indicates a sell, he goes short. If an exit, he exits. No looking here and there. Belief in the system. Trade to trade system development and enhancement. Solid pre-market preparation and after-market analysis. The works.

Mr. System addict has been around in the markets and he’s going to stay. He’s doing well. Initially, he used to be Mr. Cool, but then he went bust. The only difference was, that he had the strength to lift himself up and become Mr. System Addict.

Holy Grail, Anyone?

Posted on by
Reply

What’s the big secret, anyways?

Secret to what?

You know, making big bucks and all…!

Why are you asking me?

You look like you know things, and you talk the talk, so I presumed you walk the walk too.

Well, now don’t be surprised, but there’s no secret.

What?

You wanna make big bucks?

Yes, yes, of course I do.

Ok, then first define your risk profile. Know how much loss you can stomach.

Oh.

Then trade.

That’s it?

When you trade, your money goes on the line. And that’s a game-changer.

Why?

Coz when your money’s on the line, your emotional framework switches on.

So?

That’s when you get to know yourself. That’s when you can define your risk-profile.

And then?

Just manage your trades properly, according to the rules of your trading system.

That’s it?

Yup, just stick to your system. Cut losses when they are small. Let profits run.

I’ve heard that one.

Then have you also heard that it’s very easy to say, and most dificult to follow?

Why’s that?

Because when your money’s on the line, it is most difficult to take any loss.

Right!

And when you show a small profit, you badly want to book it.

True!

Our natural instincts go against what we need to do to succeed as a trader.

I see now.

That’s why most traders are unsuccessful, and they eventually go bust, or quit.

Hmmm, dunno if I want to be a trader.

You could try your hand at investing, though. There, one proceeds in an opposite manner.

Hey, why don’t you tell me about it, like right now?

Maybe some other day. First digest all of this, ok?

And Now for the Most Useless Question

Posted on by
1

For the trader, the most useless question regarding the markets is … …

“The Why of the Markets.”

Why is there a spike or a crash?

Frankly, who cares?

Just forget about it. The “Why” of the markets is baggage, it’s a load, and exactly this particular load needs to be abandoned.

When a trade is on, one’s got enough emotional overload to deal with anyways. Let the pundits bother themselves with this “Why”. It’s their bread and butter. Your bread and butter is the trade. Focus on the trade. Focus on entry. Focus on trade management. Focus on exit. Don’t focus on anything else. Blank the whole world out while you trade.

Then, when you reach home, focus on your family.