Uncharted Territory : The Tough get Going

Posted on by
Reply

These are unprecedented times.

I mean, you’ve got 10-Sigma events occuring at a frequency that’s nobody’s business.

It’s time for the tough to get going.

All other investors are gonna get slaughtered.

So what makes one a tough investor, someone who can take hits and still remain standing?

Firstly, there’s holding power. If you don’t possess holding power, don’t enter the markets.

Then there’s patience. A rare commodity.

Discipline. Play to a strategy. Pick a strategy that’s in sync with your risk profile.

That brings us to the most important point. Know yourself. Know your risk profile. Your strengths and weaknesses. Invest accordingly. This one might take a while.

With time comes the power to pinpoint buying opportunities. Just as the exit strategy is crucial for the trader, the entry point is all-important for the investor.

Wins give confidence to double up on one’s position size.

Sight of one’s goal keeps one away from noise and a dangerous thing called tips.

An otherwise balanced life keeps one occupied elsewhere so that one’s not tempted to try other stunts in the market.

You can complete this list. It’s really not rocket-science.

It’s time for the tough to get going.

Time after Time

Posted on by
Reply

I know, I know, the title of this blogpost is also a hit-song by Cyndi Lauper from the ’80s. As a kid and entering my teens, a rainbow-coloured Cyndi made an impression.

So, as fragile Miss Lauper with her multi-coloured hair was crooning the song to the top of the pops, the world was coming to terms with the aftermaths of the Iran hostage crisis, the Falklands war etc. etc.

Cyndi didn’t know it at the time, but the track “Time after Time” would go on to become a huge, huge hit, appearing in the sound-tracks of many movies and basically becoming an all-time song.

World makets recovered to the dotcom boom of the 90s. Investors were making the mistake of greed, again, time after time. Scrips with no earnings were selling for hundreds of times the book-value.

Bubbles burst. That’s what bubbles do. In the ensuing mayhem and the fear that engulfed investors, the share prices of capital-gains generating zero-debt companies with regularly increasing dividends and impeccable managements fell drastically too. That’s what fear does, time after time.

As time passes, investors forget their old mistakes. A horde of newbies joins the fray, ready to make the same mistakes of human nature, again, time after time.

Cyndi’s was a love song. It had nothing to do with finance cycles.

It’s title is so compelling though. And, of course, I just love the song.

Pieces of the Pie

Posted on by
Reply

When profits are made, everybody involved wants a piece of the pie.

That’s ok, human nature.

And what’s wrong in distributing profits proportional to efforts?

Well, it’s not an ideal world. In today’s real world, investment banks have started billing clients for research and have used the money for prostitution and other recreation instead (see the docufilm “Inside Job”).

Your private equity executive will travel business or first class. He or she will stay in the executive suite. Hmmm, borderline, but still bearable if the fund generates an above market-average profit for you.

What’s unbearable is the high-roller life exhibited by disgraced Lehman ex CEO Fuld for example. You know, as in fool the public, eat their pie, and pull out personal funds before the ship sinks with an overload of public stake. Inexcusable behaviour. Deserving of extremely deterring punishment.

If a listed company regularly raises its dividend and generates steady capital gains for its share-holders, I frankly couldn’t care less if the CEO zips around in a company jet, pitches his tent in the presidential suite and orders in from the most expensive restaurant in town.

On the other hand, I do take serious exception to above behaviour on company expense if the company dishes out a meagre dividend and generates no capital gains. If I’m invested in such a company by mistake, with above CEO behaviour, I’d seriously look to exit at the next opportunity. If I see the CEO downsizing on lifestyle and if I still believe in the prospects of the company, I might still stay invested, but first I want to see some humility in the CEO’s living habits.

An exit is an ultimate thumbs-down a long-term investor can give to a loser CEO and his listed company. If a business is not generating profits and the management is living it up, such a business deserves the boot from its investors.

Learning to Sit

Posted on by
Reply

One of the first things a baby learns is to sit.

And sitting is probably the last thing that an investor learns. Some investors never learn to sit. Their long-term returns are disastrous.

Wanna make a killing? All right, first learn to sit.

To be able to sit, one needs to create proper conditions. One needs to take “jumpiness”, or volatility, out of the equation. This is done by buying with a margin of safety.

Having bought with a margin of safety, market blow-ups affect your bottom-line lesser. You can sit thru them.

And that’s all you need to do, to allow a multi-bagger to unfold.

Wish you lucrative investing!

Noose Just Tightened

Posted on by
Reply

Petrol’s up 5 bucks.

This is gonna pinch the public.

Are we now clear on the fact that a beast is on the loose? And the fact that this beast has been active to hyper-active since World War I ?

This beast is called inflation. The number 1 infectious disease that inflicts modern financial society.

We are going to have to live with inflation. Period.

What is required is long-term policy-making that will minimize the affliction. That’s not happening.

Modern financial policy seeks to avoid an existence where inflation becomes hyper. That would be when food on the table costs more that a cart-load of cash. See Argentina during its currency collapse, or Germany after the first World War.

Let’s assume that human-kind is not capable of making better policies, ones that minimize (let alone eradicate) the disease. Where does that leave us?

What do we do with our money, that’s being eaten away at 8 to 9%, year upon year?

Avenues like fixed deposits pay out lesser after tax than what inflation eats away. The 100 year return in Gold has been 1% per annum compunded, after tax. Only two investment avenues have yielded more after tax than what inflation has consumed over the very long term. These are 1). Property, and 2). Equity.

The writing on the wall becomes clear. To immunize one’s money against the disease, one needs to be invested in one or both these avenues over the long-term. Both avenues come with pitfalls, where one can lose much more than what inflation eats away.

So, one first learns how to deal with the pitfalls, and perhaps one can specialize in either of these avenues, since it is not easy to focus on both.

Then, after having learnt the ropes, one can slowly start salting one’s money away.

A Fall to Remember

Posted on by
Reply

Ok, these are big drops in the values of commodities. Especially Silver.

Actually, I’m liking it.

No, I am not short Silver, or short Oil, or short Gold.

As far as commodities go, I don’t trade in them, I invest in them.

And as Silver falls big time, I am buying shares of Silver mining companies. Small amounts, nothing big. One needs to tread carefully. Because one doesn’t know when prices will stabilize.

Prices were way too high earlier to go ahead with these purchases. But, as Silver falls, one starts getting a margin of safety in Silver mining companies. I feel this has just started happening. Which is not to say that Silver won’t fall more.

Which is when I’ll buy more.

This is long-term investing. Here, the ideology is the complete opposite of trading.

Where are u going, Mrs. Market?

Posted on by
Reply

Mrs. Market follows no one’s rules.

She’s got a mind of her own.

We need to understand that.

She likes attention. We need to keep asking her where she’s going.

The wrong thing is to ask each other where she’s going. Why not ask the source?

So how does one ask her?

By putting one’s money on the line and getting into a trade.

You’ll get your answer all right.

She’ll tell you where she’s going. If it’s a winning trade, she’s going where you think she’s going.

If it’s a losing trade, she’s got other plans.

And you’ve got your job cut out: i.e. to get out of the losing trade and to move in her direction.

Strategies for Correcting Silver – One Approach

Posted on by
1

Mega rallies are followed by big drawdowns in a bull market.

That’s how it is.

Anyone who doesn’t understand this will be made to understand it. The market doesn’t care about one’s emotions.

In today’s bull markets, a volatile entity like Silver can correct by 9 $ an ounce within a few days. Let’s accept the fact that this has happened, because it has.

So how does one play correcting Silver?

A bull market ceases to be a bull market below a certain price level as per Dow theory. That hasn’t happened yet, so a trader, in my opinion, still needs to play the long side. Of course with a stop. And not any odd stop. A risk-profile tuned stop with trigger activation, and with a large difference between trigger price and limit price. This is because Silver is moving very big either way currently within a very short time span, and if trigger and limit aren’t separated by a huge gap, they can both be overshot and the poor trader can be left hanging in the losing trade, holding on to his pants.

The investor, on the other hand, is waiting patiently for Silver to reach a certain level of correction before buying bullion. Opinions vary what this level should be. My opinion is that a 61.8% Fibonacci correction level should suffice for entry. I think that’s happening now, so if Silver stabilizes at or near the current price (40.84 $ an ounce), that would be my price for a medium term entry.

Of course I could be all wrong.

I like to make mistakes, because they are the best teachers. Better that any professors or theoreticians.

Trigger Mechanisms in Trading

Posted on by
Reply

Trigger mechanisms can fine-tune one’s trading by leaps and bounds.

There’s the buy stop. It’s used to only get into a trade above a certain price level. Below that price level, one isn’t bullish, and doesn’t wish to enter the trade.

Then there’s the sell stop. It’s used to execute a short sale below a certain level. One is bearish below that level only; above the level one doesn’t wish to enter the trade.

A short-seller can also use the buy stop to square off a short sale going against him or her.

Similarly, a person who is long can use the sell stop to square off a buy going against him or her.

How does the trigger mechanism work? There are two components: the trigger price and the limit price. Once the trigger price is “triggered”, only then is the order activated. This triggered order is then carried out within the range defined by the limit price. If the trigger price is not reached, the order is not activated.

This gives the trader the added advantage of not having to watch the screen all the time. In fact, some traders use the trigger mechanism while punching in their orders, and do something else the rest of the day.

More importantly, the trigger mechanism allows the trader to be where the action is when the action happens.

Trigger mechanisms are how professionals do it. You can use them too, because they are available on any and every trading platform doing the rounds.

Options 1.0.2

Posted on by
Reply

Options can be approached intuitively. I love that about options.

They carry their own stop-loss with them. That’s the second thing I love about them.

Soon, they’ll be operable from your mobile handset.

I mean, could it get any more versatile?

The voodoo mathematics surrounding options might or might not work. Sheer intuition coupled with a manual stop is another way of doing it.

Yup, one isn’t dependent on the automatic in-built stop in options, though this is a good tool when one doesn’t have access to a laptop. When one does, one can fine-tune the stop manually.

Options are getting more and more liquid in India. Still can’t compare them to the US options scenario, which is a thriving and rollicking state of affairs, but things are setting up beautifully here.

Amidst everything, I forgot to mention that options are a wonderful hedging tool. That’s probably their most important function.

You must be Joking, Mr. Nath!

Posted on by
1

Ok, so there are aliens, so what?

I mean, is that so hard to believe? Which law says that Earth is the centre of activity in this universe?

Look around you. The horizon is full of scams. An honest management is most difficult to find. Honesty and integrity have become alien virtues. Scarce, don’t bump into them in normal life, and you might read an odd story about them in the papers.

So where does this leave you as an investor?

In a dishonest world, one needs to think in a warped manner to make money. You know, “two steps away from the norm” kinda thinking. So if the norm is to buy on a dip, in Kalyuga one waits to buy on a mega-dip. And these have started occuring more often than they used to. 10-Sigma or Black Swan events happen every now and then.

The thing I like about scams is that eventually, they explode. The one scam that is exposed (against the 20 that go unexposed) is enough to hit mass psychology. The common investor starts selling everything, even stuff that’s not affected by the scam. The market as a whole falls, sometimes cracking big.

Since we’re mostly down to buying scam-artist run corporations as investors, above-mentioned crack is the time to buy them, i.e. when they are hit badly. That’s when you are getting good value for your money. That’s when you are getting your margin of safety.

So, wait for the explosion. Buy in its aftermath. The interim period between explosions is to be used to pinpoint what you want to buy with a margin of safety, whenever that margin of safety abounds.

It is entirely within the realm of possibilities to live at peace with aliens. And it is equally possible for an investor to learn to live honestly but lucratively in a world full of corporate criminals.

Managing Loss & Coming Back to Zero – 2 Star Qualities of a Successful Trader

Posted on by
1

Heads or tails?

Theoretically, it’s a 50:50 chance.

And over a large number of coin flips, it works out to be 50:50.

On the other hand, over a relatively smaller number of coin flips, one can have many heads (or for that matter tails) in a row. Let’s say you flip a coin ten times. Chances are, you might get heads eight times in a row. I mean, it actually happens.

For a market participant without any edge, a given trade is like a coin-flip. It can go either way. So, eight losses in a row can happen. Losing trade after losing trade can come, longer than one can remain solvent. This needs to be understood.

Therefore, the need arises to cut losses when they are very small.

Also, one needs to understand, that the next trade has nothing to do with the last trade. The outcome of a new trade is fully independent of the past. There is no rule saying that the 8th trade after 7 losses has to be a winning trade.

The successful trader comes back to zero after each closed trade. He or she let’s go of any baggage from the last trade, and starts a fresh one with new and full focus. There are no expectations from the new position. If it doesn’t work, the loss will be cut very small, and the savvy trader will bring his or her mind back to zero-point, and then will initiate a fresh position.

It’s really not rocket-science.

Anatomy of a Ponzi Scheme

Posted on by
Reply

Charles Ponzi came up with the brilliant idea of paying early investors dividends from the investment money put in by later investors.

It’s as simple as that, and it’s called a Ponzi scheme.

After the first few dividends, promoter disappears, having lured many investors into a fake scheme with no underlying business.

Latest famous example of a Ponzi schemer – Bernie Maddoff.

Or, if you’ve not seen Damages – Season III, that’s about a Ponzi scheme too.

So what lures the common investor into a Ponzi scheme?

Simple. It’s called greed.

What triggers the greed?

The Ponzi schemer concocts a scheme that promises a rather too lucrative return. This return does not look unrealistic, so the average investor’s alarm signals don’t go off. Nevertheless, it’s more than high enough to make the average investor’s mouth water.

And what’s normally promised is a quick return, mind you. The average investor buys smoothly into the idea of doubling his or her money fast.

Then there’s lots of advertisment. Billboards everywhere. The Ponzi schemer wants to hit the public with ads about the tremendous returns.

The sales-people who sell the scheme are glib-talkers. They are smart, wear expensive stuff, basically exuding sophistication. They want to rub it in that they’ve made it big in life.

A Ponzi scheme’s documentation generally cracks under close scrutiny. I mean, when something is being sold to you without any underlying business, all you have to do is your dose of due diligence. Just pick up the phone and start asking questions.

What works for the Ponzi schemer is human nature. The first investors (who get paid dividends from newbie investor money) start talking. Actually, they start bragging. The human being likes to show off. And, the human being hates missing the boat, even if the boatman is a disciple of Charles Ponzi.

The Dark Side of Private Equity

Posted on by
6

Greed is the investor’s nemesis.

I’ve been guilty of greed at times.

Luck has been on my side, and I’ve been saved from losing money. I’d like to tell you about it.

In my experiences with private equity over the last four years, the one thing that stood out was the pitch of each scheme proposed. The average pitch just sucked one in by describing a world that would appear utopic to somebody in a balanced frame of mind. When greed sets in, balance and common sense go out the window. One gets taken in by the pitch, and without doing any due diligence, one is willing to bet the farm.

The private equity teams of today have a tool up their sleeve that creates pressure on the investor, and leaves little time for due diligence. It’s called the time-window. Most schemes are proposed to the investor with a very short time-window. Either the investor is in within the window, or he or she can sit out. Lesson learnt: if one’s due diligence is taking longer than the time-window, then the scheme can go out the window rather than putting one’s hard-earned money on the line.

One of the worst starts a newbie investor can make is a good one. This happened to me as a newbie private equity investor. I got involved with the Milestone group in the middle of the financial crisis, and I invested in their REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts). These people were honest, and the investments have yielded steady quarterly dividends since, apart from the property appreciation. I started thinking private equity was the holy grail, and that all forthcoming institutions and schemes would be like Milestone.

Big mistake. When Edelweiss knocked on my door with an 8 year lock-in real-estate scheme, I was lapping it up. One thing kept going around in my mind – the 8 year cycle they were trying to make me believe in. Wasn’t convincing, but I wanted the profits they were promising. Before signing on, it occured to me to do at least some due diligence. I insisted on a conference call with the management. During the concall, I became aware of one wrongful disclosure. The pitch had spoken of a large sum of money from overseas, already invested in the scheme. In the concall, it became apparent that these funds were tentative and had not arrived yet.

A wrongful disclosure is a big alarm bell for me. I have programmed myself in such a way that when I come across wrongful disclosure during due diligence, I axe the investment. Luckily, the mind was not totally taken in, and I stuck to this rule.

Then came Unitech. Second generation real-estate magnate. Big money. Big leverage. In a joint venture with CIG, Unitech was redeveloping the slums of Mumbai, we were told in the pitch. Each slum-dweller would be relocated with ample compensation, we were told. The scheme had a multi-page disclaimer protecting the promoters against anything and everything. Alone that should have been an alarm bell. Of course I wasn’t thinking straight when I signed the documents.

In the next few months this scheme got a few investors interested, but its corpus wasn’t enough for the first leg of investments planned. Then, Adarsh exploded. I’m talking about the Adarsh real-estate scam. CIG / Unitech could not find a single new investor for their scheme. Everyone was scared of real-estate. Then there was another explosion: the 2G scam. Sanjay Chandra, CEO of Unitech, was one of the prime accused. What would happen to my money? Was it gone?

I got together with my bankers, and for more than a month, we steam-rolled the CIG / Unitech office in Delhi with emails and phone-calls, asking for the money to be returned with interest, since the scheme had not gotten off the ground. Luck was on our side, and after a thorough documentation process from their end, I received my entire amount with interest, one day before Sanjay Chandra was sent to jail.

Moral of the story: double your due diligence when you feel greed setting in. Don’t get taken in by fancy pitches. Don’t get pressurized into time-windows. Tackle the dark-side of private equity with a clear mind and full focus.

A Strong Case for Equity (Part 3)

Posted on by
Reply

What intrigues me most about the asset-class “Equity” can be described in two words.

Human Capital.

The human being: capable of the highest but also the lowest.

So, while pinpointing which scrip to purchase, one avoids flawed human capital.

Humans have many flaws which one’s antennae are scanning for here. Some are corrupt. Some are bad planners. Some lack management skills. It’s a big list.

What one’s looking for is integrity. Also the power to anticipate in advance. Alone this trait in the management of a company can make it grow beyond inflation and slow-down. Managers with good anticipatory powers hedge against loss in the future. For example, a company that uses Silver in its manufacturing process could use up its yearly profit to buy Silver in bulk @ 40 $ an ounce rather than buy it one year later @ 80 $ an ounce.

Honest human capital is transparent. Share-holder friendly. And if you can see any intelligence along with such characteristics, just go for the scrip at a decent valuation.

This one’s for You, Jesse!

Posted on by
Reply

Jesse Livermore – market legend.

Not with us anymore. Killed himself in a bout of depression.

Jesse’s life will be remembered. He was a pioneer, establishing the basic rules of trading for modern mankind. In the process he won many fortunes, and lost back a big part of what he won because of the hit and trial process he had to go through, to establish a basic trading map for mankind.

His was a colourful life. Pioneers, however, cannot be judged by the average person. An average human being doesn’t have the powers to comprehend the conditions under which a pioneer functions.

There were times when Jesse would swing a leveraged line worth several million dollars, and this is the first quarter of the 20th century we are talking about. He established the need and the rules for a stop-loss by losing money big time. He also won big, very big.

Jesse was the king of shorting. In the mega-crash of 1929, his unswerving short line won him a 100 million dollars. In 1907, JP Morgan (the man, not the investment firm) personally requested him to square off his shorts asap, or the US financial industry would go bankrupt. Jesse loved America, and the American way of life. He squared off his shorts.

Jesse had an eye for big market moves. He would watch a stock and get into its nervous system. Then, he would preempt its big move and would make a killing. He observed that stocks fulcrum around pivotal points, shooting up or down many notches from there within a short span of time. Making use of this insight was not enough for Jesse. He shared his knowledge with the world, so that others could benefit.

Then, another very lucrative trading insight – buying above highs – comes from Jesse. People are making serious money today in Gold and Silver for example, using this very knowledge. Others have used this strategy to their advantage by latching on to the runs of Cisco Systems, Walmart, Wipro etc. in the past. Above a high, there is no resistance, coz there is no presence of old buyers wanting to sell. Jesse was the first to recognize this.

In the early part of life, JL was impulsive. He would lose everything he made by not sticking to his own principle of stops, for example. Later, as he matured, he developed the principle of letting a winning trade run. His way of putting it was that the biggest money in the markets was made by sitting.

In his later years, Jesse started treating cash as king. When the opportunities would come, JL’s line with the bank was as deep as the pockets of Fort Knox.

I’ve shared four principles with you which Jesse Livermore actively used in his trading. These principles are priceless. I admire Jesse Livermore, and wish that he hadn’t fallen to the disease of depression.

Thanks so much, Jesse.

Is Silver in a Bubble?

Posted on by
Reply

When the chauffeur or even the doorman has an opinion, the underlying asset-class is in a bubble.

That’s my definition of a bubble.

And that’s not the case for Silver yet.

A bubble is something psychological. The mind gets twisted into believing that one’s found the holy grail. And then one can’t get enough of it.

Bill Bonner predicted in the year 2000, that Silver and Gold would be the trades of then commencing decade. What a prediction! He went on to say that in the last stages of its run, Gold would rise at the rate of 100$ an hour. You can proportionate that for Silver. That’s how a real bubble behaves. Just go back to first quarter of 2000 and observe the financial behaviour of dotcoms.

This is not a bubble yet. We are nowhere near bubble behaviour. The common households have not started selling off their household Silver. The man on the streets is not obsessed with Silver as of now. (I still look at common-man behaviour, even for Silver, because in a bubble, one forgets affordability. Apart from that, Silver can be bought by the gram).

So, where does one go from here?

Simple.

The trader keeps trading with the flow and an appropriate, risk-profile-tuned stop. For heavens sake, he or she needs to be long.

And the investor keeps buying small stakes on dips.

Nothing fancy or complicated. A simple, common-sense strategy is all that’s required.

Outperformers know how to Focus

Posted on by
Reply

Want to outperform the markets?

Then learn to focus.

Outstanding returns are the domain of focus investors.

If one is not a focus investor, then one is a diversified investor.

Diversification is not a negative trait.

It gives an average result. Over time, one’s performance matches the market average.

There’s nothing wrong in getting an average result.

It’s just that if you want something extra, here’s what you need to do.

You need to identify one or max two baskets.

And then you need to watch these baskets.

Just why is Embracing Risk so difficult?

Posted on by
1

Sir Issac Newton : mathematics and physics genius.

Let’s cast a glance at his market record.

Bought 20,000 Pounds worth of shares in the South Sea Co. around the year 1720, when the scrip was at its peak. Company went bust.

After having bought into this company at a ridiculous valuation, Sir Issac chose to sit on his investment rather than embrace a small loss in the first leg of the decline. The loss became bigger and bigger, till all was lost.

In our society today, parents push their kids to emulate Newton as far as brain-power goes. Newton has been a classic winner in the eyes of society. Kids are taught to win from the beginning. Losing is taboo.

When a straight A candidate enters the market, he or she gets a rude shock. Here is a world where losing is bread and butter. The straight A candidate is likely to get hammered.

A winner in the markets knows how to lose. He or she loses many times. But loses small. Then come the wins. They are not booked small. They are allowed to run.

This concept goes against our basic programming. When we show a small profit, we want to book it and run. It is an ingrained reflex.

When we are losing, we wait to catch up and start winning instead of embracing the small loss and moving on. Also a natural reflex.

Thus, embracing risk is a very difficult thing to learn.

If one can’t do it after many losses, one should leave the markets alone.

The Willingness to Embrace Risk

Posted on by
2

Any given market-play can only prove successful if one particular state of mind exists.

I’m talking about one’s willingness to embrace risk.

I mean, one can define risk all one wants, and one can understand it to the nth level.

But is one willing to embrace it?

The answer to this question is the singular deciding factor between a losing market player and a winning market player.

And what does embracing market risk mean?

Setting a stop is a physical act. One can do it mindlessly, without the actual willingness to accept a loss when it occurs.

Embracing risk means the attunement of every cell in the body towards accepting a loss when it occurs.

Accepting the loss and then moving on to the next market-play.
No psychological entanglements, no what-if scenarios, no why’s, no energy drainage due to mourning. Just sheer acceptance of loss. Period.

That’s the state of mind required.

Then, over time, as the sample-size grows, one starts winning.

That’s because one only plays the market with an edge.