Paying the Price

Hey.

In the markets…

…our convictions fight against each other.

Cut to the ongoing core IT vs AI standoff.

With mega spends on standoff propaganda alone, currently, the AI lobby is winning.

Not…

…comprehensively.

I fight from the core IT lobby side, which, btw, is evolving, obviously not fast enough in the eyes of almost all, and the image badgering continues.

One admits to being wrong for a while.

Admission means action.

Low-conviction SaaS names bow out. Losses taken. From what remains, stronger names bought, in innovative arenas. Ballast. Bought. Clean balance sheets. Vision. Bought.

Coming to the high-conviction names, they will remain.

However, taking on the humiliation of admitting, accepting and dealing with low-conviction losers is something I am deliberately doing.

I’d much rather discuss my losers with you.

It doesn’t mean I’m not holding winners.

It’s just that I’m choosing to discuss my losers with you.

On purpose.

A little bit of humiliation everyday, admitted, acted upon, and gotten rid of, goes a very long way. One wakes up to holding multibaggers, one fine day, sooner than later, in this manner.

And on that day, some of my high-conviction IT names, if still around in portfolio when they beat the propaganda machines of the AI brigade by posting unexpectedly great results, will then also count amongst the multibaggers held.

On the other hand, if this doesn’t happen for a longish enough time, high convictions will turn lower, ultimately underceding a minimal threshold. Since I finance my expenses by selling losers, and put my income into fresh potential winners, underceders will eventually exit. That’s the price one pays for pursuing multibagger accumulation.

Point is, ultimately, losers find the exit door. Before they become losers, they get ample leeway, measured both in time, and in notional losses, since conviction is, for that long time period, high enough to not identify them as weeds. However, once mentality flips, the weed is born in the mind. Once the mind makes up its mind that something is a weed…

…that something needs to be weeded out, …

…only to be replaced with potential flowers, …

…again, and again and again.

Staples

At the start of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, …

…and well into it,…

…as per media reports, …

…the matter should have been over / resolved / won…

…way, way, …

…way back.

Guess which media’s reports were reaching us.

Were they reporting correctly? Or brainwashing?

You tell me.

Is that particular conflict over?

You tell me.

Who is emerging from the conflict?

You tell me.

Which media’s reports are reaching us wrt current war outbreak?

You tell me. If you don’t, let me tell you. Same spin-doctors as always.

Only, this time around, one has gotten more selective in what one believes.

Ya, ya, this current conflict is all but won, it’s only a matter of days, sure, adversary will be on the table for talks etc. etc. Meanwhile…

…we mentally prepare for another…

…Vietnam.

Afghanistan.

Iraq.

Russia-Ukraine.

Prepare as in length, devastation, impact, whole shebang.

Only one thing is true.

NO ONE KNOWS.

Amongst other things, the word ‘narrative’ has become a by-word for…

…lies…

…so it might be a better ploy to…

…not believe.

Also meanwhile, we keep doing our staples.

What are these?

Our outlined course of action, should such a situation arise as the one that has.

What’s our mental programming?

That this can go anywhere.

How long do we keep going?

Till it lasts, or till we exhaust our ammunition, if this lasts beyond.

Ammunition? Are we fighting?

Not a war. Just usual markets. In the markets, liquidity is ammunition. One wishes to be fully invested, thus this strategy has been devised for exactly such scenarios.

Simple as that?

Ya, simple as staples.